You are here
L. Arnold - Fri, 2015/05/08 - 08:14
Running TKLDEV
just brought in tkl-setup
then apt-get upate
Got the following error:
There is no Public Key available for the following public Key ID's
(long ones)
///////
But MAKE on basic Core
and
MAKE on LAPP (renamed ODOO-LAPP) (new build)
failing with Error
Unable to locate package isolinux
(on any build)
Unfortunately I killed my functioning TKLDEV image an hour ago so can't go back to that one. Maybe I have a real old one.. Joomla32.. will try next.
Forum:
Does this have to do with change from Sourceforge to Mirror.TKL
I see in the Docs that the old Source was Sourceforge.
Perhaps all sources are not loaded into Mirror yet??
Likely all there but.. ?
Older 386 build of TKLDEV proceeds after Apt-Get Update
MAKE worked on 386 Ver of TKLDEV.
I did not run updates, and it seems Make is making its way through a Cloned Lapp.
Failed prior to Apt-Get Update.
UNABLE to finds some Archives...
Host pi.turnkeylinux.org lookup failed: Timeout
recomends: maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix missing.
(I did run apt-get update on Wheezy64 System but failed)
Will try on this after Snapshot .now
_iWondering if the tkldev-setup is out of synch somehow with the Wheezy OVF I downloaded a few weeks back..
Likely should do a new Pull of TKLDEV for 64 Wheezy and use ISO just in Case.
Is this a new setup of TKLDev?
Testing Tkldev on Jessie then..
I've downloaded and installed Jessie RC1 and am testing on Core right now. Always takes a while but seems to be working. (WORKED!)
Main thing to note is that TKLDev-Setup needs to be run, but it does not need to be downloaded. Not really clear why it does not run automatically, but good for me to figure that out anyway.
TklDev-Setup basically clones Core as far as I can see in the Jessie build and does not do too much else.
Since there is a Core RC1 also, this is just an exercize. Will see what happens on Lapp etc next.
Never a short process. No errors yet though ! (You guys are pretty amazing if you ask me!) Where do the ISO Images land? (added the answer inset)
I hope that Wheezy, Squeeze etc will still work if folks are processing with them. As noted my Wheezy 386 TKLDEV (from ISO) worked yesterday but not a new Wheezy 64 OVF version of TKLDEV (perhaps If I run again, I can skip the download and TklDev-Setup is ready to run in Wheezy as well. Trick is to see if it is there in /usr/local/sbin as it was in Jessie version)
Expect I need to get my arms around SSH Keys soon. Separate Thread.
LAPP failed though
seemed close but we got to here:
Likely Lapp has not caught up with Core with different build schemes.
back to the project w/ 386 Wheezy. Cool to see Jessie running though!
(Support not needed just now as this is Off the Current System)
Version If then Statement seems likely needed
As Jessie is forcing a change to either the file name or the Folder structure, seems the Lapp.mk (or something) file needs to make the file go one way above Jessie, and another way below Jessie.
Testing some Odoo builds. Running into the same w/ Jessie.
386 Wheezy TKLDEV working at it now. Looks like some of my packages are coming in now.. cool.
Will report more.
Pretty sure I've fixed the LAPP issues...
The v14.0 (Jessie) build should all be good now...
Out of interest is there a specific reason why you're not keen to be working on Jessie/v14.0? Or was it just because that wasn't working properly?
Am Keen on Jessie, but comments
Fundamentally the SSL issues I was running into in Jessie wanted me to see if my builds (focused on SSL changes) were working at least in Wheezy.
It seems you posted something about SSL changes in Magento that might model the SSL changes needed in general for Jessie.
I do think it is important that the different rungs of the ladder work and work into the future. It seemed that the Wheezy package was pulled forward in such a way that the general (on site last week) TKLDEV image would not work.
I have gotten some Jessie builds to run (Those are not the Site pulled version however).
Finally, since I need to pull a Wheezy built system (on Postgresql) into a Jessie built system (likely on LAPP, but perhaps just a tweaked Postgresql) it seemed practical to have a Wheezy method for replicating the build I have now as well as the Mods.
If I can get my head around the SSL changes that may suffice to work just with Jessie. As noted though, would seem best if different versions would generally work on their own level.
(As an aside I would call "Jessie" v. 15 (for 2015)
TBH I don't understand...
In my tests SSL works (and TBH hasn't ever caused me any issues) so I'm not at all clear on what you mean there... However, the default Jessie Apache config doesn't support HTTPS (SSL) OOTB so perhaps that's what you're referring to? Regardless, commits I made recently (and have been merged by Alon) should mean that all appliances are now available via http or https...
Just responding to your question re being Keen on Jessie
I had checked out for a week. In the interum it seems that Jessie TKLDEV etc are working better. In that interum you had asked "why I was not keen on jessie".
The note above just spoke to why I was trying to get earlier versions to work (ie, trying to get a new App to build in various generations). This was complicated by the "redirection goal" that was tied to the early SSL changes between Jessie and Wheezy and my difficulty in getting Wheezy TKLDEV to work in 64bit mode. (lets not go into that anymore, I think we are beyond it)
The new Updates are really great. SSL issues have gone away on default appliances. Just need to line up some of my configs for the Odoo. Good progress on this today.
Great, thanks for clearing that up! :)
The apace config that I posted for odoo on that other thread will most likely need some tweaking to get it to work properly with v14/Jessie though - things have changed a bit between Apache2.2 (v13/wheezy) and Apache2.4 (v14/jessie).
There is certainly progress all round though! :)
2 rounds on make at Branch (not called, but perhaps 13.1)
Wheezy Version that was captured at branch (defined of sorts) by
nearly built but Errored:
make: *** [build/stamps/root.build] Error 1
(trying to parse the error. May have possibly just been a timeout, so running Make again.)
ROUND 2 Did WORK in terms of completing. I will try the Modified TKLDEV ISO next.
Didn't Boot new TKLDEV
probably needs another course.
THe ISO that TKLDEV created of itself (with branch's defined above) did not boot to install for me.
lets not sweat this right now. Back to Jessie 64 and 32 bit Wheezy for a bit.
nope..
even after reboot. Still missing Kernel gfxboot
Comment flow
Would rather this comment show up above.
It looked like I would need to Clone TKLDEV first so that Git is applied, then do the second checkout above.
I assumed assume from that that a new TKLDEV-MAKE make would be needed to run on the TKLDEV folder, building a new ISO then using that as a basis for Wheezy TKLDEV processes.
Testing (and proceeding) now (see comments above on my current view anyway)
thanks Jeremy
I may/should have some more time tonight.
Working to get my working Odoo clean on 443 with no port number showing and have it be in LAPP. Now it's in Postgres and hasn't migrated well yet. It will though.
Purpose of an Odoo App is to simplify this of course.
Thanks again.
Lands
Add new comment